Home  ⁄  City Projects  ⁄  Pipeline Projects  ⁄  Innovative Project Development  ⁄  Integrated Approach vs The Traditional Approach

The Integrated Approach vs The Traditional Approach




No events listed.



STEP UP Final Newsletter

Our final STEP UP Newsletter has just gone out to our subscribers.  The newsletter has information updating you on each city's progress, SEAP and recent events and achievements. Click here to view our newsletter.

Celsius Smart Cities Workshop- 16th September 2015

This interactive workshop will bring together excellence from several advanced European Smart Cities projects that will put forward their expertise and their project results on integrated planning, energy efficiency and district energy solutions, among others.

MSc Global Sustainable Cities Brochure

The Institute for Future Cities (IFC) has published a new brochure for the MSc Global Sustainable Cities.

The cities’ innovative projects have been evaluated and compared to show the impact of using the integrated approach instead of the traditional approach. The focus has been on energy and economics, but also on technology and innovation, stakeholders, risks and other policy objectives.

Cities considered what their projects would look like if a traditional approach was used instead of an integrated approach. A project with an integrated approach can be defined as a project that tries to achieve more “holistic solutions” to complex problems by integrating different kinds of stakeholders, sectors, technologies, and so on.

Key findings

The key findings when comparing the integrated approach with the traditional approach is that the integrated approach means:

  • Better energy performance – in energy savings, CO2 emissions reduction and renewables production (where renewables generation is applicable to the project);
  • Larger projects with often higher investment costs;
  • Greater capacity to attract investment;
  • More complex project organisation;
  • Increased  numbers of stakeholders involved;
  • Increased benefits in all three sustainability dimensions – environmental, social and economic; and
  • The need for a robust management structure.

The infographic below shows the overall conclusions in terms of energy performance, implementation costs, number of stakeholders and risks. However, it should also be recognised that there is a great variation between the projects; find out more by navigating through the tabs under ‘Innovative project development’ on the left of this page.

Traditional approach vs integrated approach – an overview of all innovative projects

Key recommendations

Recommendations for STEP UP cities interested in continuing to compare impacts from integrated and traditional approaches, or for other projects and initiatives looking follow a similar line of enquiry, include:

  • Define relevant key words very clearly
  • Compare similar projects
  • Compare projects within the same time span, and with roughly the same pace of development
  • Analyse projects from multiple perspectives
  • Revisit projects later in the implementation stage to assess benefits delivered

There are also some recommendations relevant for cities interested in applying an integrated approach to their own project development:

  • Consider using the integrated approach to solve complex problems
  • Take a holistic view of the integrated approach
  • Involve multiple stakeholders
  • Consider project organisation early on
  • Start to gather data as early as possible
  • Use visual communication tools to present integrated projects to a wider audience

To read more about this work, the key features of the innovative projects using an integrated and traditional approach, and the recommendations above, download the STEP UP summary report here.

For further advice and recommendations on developing sustainable energy projects, please see the STEP UP guide here.

If you have any further enquiries about this work, please contact info@stepupsmartcities.eu


Get in Touch